Why MaxIron

One partner for the life of the Maximo estate

A UK ferry operator completed its Maximo upgrade in seven months and retained the same MaxIron team for the ongoing service.

One published engagement

A ferry operator upgrade carried into live operation

The upgrade combined application migration, database conversion and one production cutover. The same architects continued on the support account.

  • Starting release

    IBM Maximo 7.6

    The operator entered the programme on IBM Maximo 7.6.

  • Live release

    IBM MAS 9.0.1

    The upgrade put IBM MAS 9.0.1 into production.

  • Runtime

    Red Hat OpenShift

    The live IBM MAS estate runs on Red Hat OpenShift.

Client decisions recorded

  • The scope baseline and retire list agreed before the build
  • Inventory definitions agreed with stores and engineering
  • The production cutover decision against the support milestone

Delivery commitments

Four commitments behind the work

02

Continuity into operation

Where hosting and support are in scope, delivery knowledge stays with the account. The ferry upgrade retained the architects who designed the move into its ongoing service.

Ferry upgrade and continuing support

03

Disciplined engineering

Inventories, supported platform design, trial loads and rehearsed cutovers turn technical decisions into acceptance evidence. Change and release records identify the approver and the scope of each change.

Airport architecture and operational controls

04

Retained knowledge

Written data standards, runbooks and paired delivery preserve the decisions needed to maintain the estate. The gas-network workstream transferred standards ownership and development capability to internal roles.

Utility data and capability transfer

How the work runs

Measure, decide, deliver, operate

The same sequence on an implementation, an upgrade or a live estate we take over. Each step produces an artefact the client keeps.

  1. 01

    Measure

    Customisation and integration inventory first. For an upgrade, that is the input to a fixed quote and a trial run in a non-production environment.

  2. 02

    Decide

    Upgrade or rebuild, MaxIron Cloud or your Azure, AWS or OCI, which MAS components are in this phase. Written down before the build starts.

  3. 03

    Deliver

    Named architect, agreed release cadence, and a record of who approved each change. The products that hold that record are on the products page.

  4. 04

    Operate

    Platform operations on MaxIron Cloud or in your Azure, AWS or OCI subscription, and application support with continuity from delivery into the live service.

For a 7.6 estate, start with the upgrade quote. For an estate already in service, start with a 30-minute health-check review.

Engagement scope

Agree the responsibilities before delivery starts

MaxIron specialises in IBM Maximo and MAS. The service schedule records the people, scope, acceptance evidence and operating responsibilities for the engagement.

Named people and continuity

The proposal identifies the accountable lead and delivery roles. Named-person continuity and notice of a change can be agreed in the contract schedule.

Measured scope and pricing

Fixed pricing follows the customisation and integration inventory. Before assessment, an estimate states the assumptions and the factors that can change scope.

Customer approvals

Business-role access, asset-data definitions, operating priorities and production acceptance remain with the customer’s accountable owners unless the contract assigns them differently.

Knowledge and service boundaries

Runbooks, standards ownership and knowledge transfer are agreed for the workstream. Hosting layers, support coverage and recovery objectives are written into the service schedule.

Put the open question to a senior engineer.

Describe the current version, hosting, interfaces and delivery requirement. A senior lead will identify the assessment needed, the responsibilities MaxIron can carry and the approvals your team will hold.

Useful to have on the call

  • Your Maximo or MAS version, fix pack level and number of environments
  • The customisation and integration inventory, however incomplete
  • The regulator, framework or standard your reporting has to satisfy
  • The date that is already fixed, and who fixed it